No outro dia falei da Tammy Bruce, lésbica neo-conservadora. Reproduzo aqui um trecho de uma de suas colunas, na qual critica a criação de “escolas para gays” nos EUA:
There is a sick movement among the homosexual academics and the radical gay fringe to change the age of sexual consent in this nation to 12-years-old. As sexually transmitted diseases for both hetero- and homosexuals increases and HIV/AIDS runs rampant, the goal by some to have access to children (untouched virgins, free of disease) has increased.
This agenda is facilitated by efforts like the "gay high school," which, in my opinion, furthers the sexualization of children.
Consider this: Accepting the “gay high school” demands you accept the notion that there are “gay and transgender kids,” which on its face is simply ridiculous. The argument is that children as young as 13 and 14-years-old somehow know, in their immature little kid minds, what their sexuality is, including if they’re a “transgendered youth,” which is a child who believes he or she should be the opposite sex. Frankly, if there is a 14 year-old boy who wants to have his penis removed to become a “girl,” that kid needs to be in a psychiatrist’s office, not a high school created just for him.
Think about it: we’re talking about children who are not psychologically mature enough to decide what to have for dinner, let along comprehend the intricacies of sexuality and all its physical and psychological repercussions. But the Gay Elite want us to believe that somehow these children know they prefer to have anal sex or need their breasts removed to find their “true” selves. Yeah, and I’m Anna Nicole Smith.
I cannot even begin to express my rage at a radical gay fringe and leftists who now are openly and willingly sacrificing children in a vain and self-obsessed drive to quench their own appetites for the young. That’s all this amounts to—adults indulging themselves, and others made too mute by political correctness to step up and say "No."
Apparently “gay children” need to be trained so they can be productive, stereotypical gays. The new principal of this atrocity has proudly announced that his school will “specialize in computer technology, art and culinary programs.” Isn’t that great? What else? Flower arrangement? Hair design? Dance?
In all this madness, after psychologically trapping and abandoning these kids, we then limit their options and train them to be stereotypical, victimized, angry caterers and dancers and florists. Hey, maybe this is a conspiracy to make sure Bravo’s “Queer Eye for the Straight Guy” will never run out of Queer Specialists!
The insult of all this to gay people is absolutely astonishing.
Even supporters of the gay school concept admit that the so-called gay kids they’re dealing with suffer from sexual acting-out, suicidal tendencies, drug abuse, and homelessness. The fact is, all of these symptoms are indications of sexual molestation, not homosexuality. So, instead of helping these kids deal with a serious trauma, they’ll be called “gay” and sent to a school to become a chef.
Welcome to the Left’s progressive world.
Deve-se fazer uma diferença entre adultos homossexuais, que têm a liberdade de realizar o que desejarem sem importunar os outros no conforto do seu lar, e o movimento político gayzista, que utiliza a opção sexual como bandeira política de atos radicais. Mesmo lésbicas como Tammy Bruce se dão conta que deve haver um limite, e a doutrinação de crianças é uma delas.
Na verdade, a coisa é bem pior. Um hospital de Boston já oferece tratamento com hormônios a crianças de 10 a 12 anos que queiram “retardar a puberdade” até decidir “se são homens ou mulheres”. Eu assisti certa vez um documentário sobre “transgenders”, que é o nome politicamente dos travecos (e era um documentário pró-transgenders), e vi tantas aberrações, tamanho festival de freaks, que, ao cotrário de ser doutrinado, fiquei convencido que os chamados transexuais são pessoas que, em geral, têm graves distúrbios psíquicos. Não estamos falando dos divertidos travestis ficcionais dos filmes de Almodóvar, mas de gente realmente problemática, que transfere ao corpo seus traumas.
A sociedade pode e deve tentar ajudá-los, é claro. Mas não transformá-los em nova regra de comportamento. Não financiar suas cirurgias ou festivais com dinheiro público. E, muito menos, permitir que crianças possam “trocar de sexo”.
3 comentários:
seu blog tá muito bom
:-) Obrigado!
Devo concordar com você. Essa "oferta" de "serviços" tão radicais — afinal de contas, terapias hormonais e intervenções cirúrgicas são bem mais do que usar batom e peruca... —, não leva em consideração o sujeito em formação. É um tema difícil, sem dúvida, mas oferecer alternativas como se fossem diferentes marcas de produtos vendidas num supermercado não me parecem alternativas sensatas.
Postar um comentário